Scotch mist and COP26
The most common definition of Scotch Mist is “A cold and penetrating mist, verging on rain.” There is however another definition: “Something that is hard to find or does not exist”. The latter is the one I am using as a basis of this post, and I’ve chosen it because I am going to look for evidence of warming in Scotland. Glasgow is in Scotland and is, of course, the venue for the COP 26 climate meeting so all the eyes of the world are on that country.
The first question to examine is “Is Scotland different to
England?” The British Meteorological Office publishes long-term climate data
for almost 40 climate stations covering all constituent countries of the United
Kingdom. So, for a start let’s compare the long temperature records of Oxford and
Stornaway Airport. Oxford is in England and almost as far form the sea as it is
possible to be in that country. Its record started in 1853. Stornaway is on the
Island of Lewis, to the west of Scotland, and its data go back to 1873.
The chart shows the temperature record of the two stations
from 1873, when both stations were operating, to 2020. For both stations the
lines represent the difference from the mean for the period 1873 to 1970. The
fine line shows the annual average temperature values for both stations and the
broader line shows 11-year moving average values. Three things are immediately
obvious. The first is that temperatures are, in general, rising for the whole
period. Secondly, the record for Oxford shows more variation. This is to be
expected as it is further from the moderating influence of the sea. The third
thing it shows is that in recent years the temperature has been rising more for
Oxford than for Stornaway. This is particularly noticeable for the last ten
years as over that period Stornaway temperatures were stable but those for
Oxford continued to rise. This third point suggests that rising temperature is, perhaps, an urban rather than a global phenomenon
A separate factor, which I discussed a few years ago on this
site and will come back to in the future, is that the temperature rise is far from
constant: there are even periods when the temperature is falling. This is not
built into current climate models. In my earlier post I showed that this increase
and fall in the rate of temperature increase was coincident with the ‘Atlantic
Multidecadal Oscillation’. In the latest, 2021, IPCC report there are 37
references to that phrase, all but three of are in titles of publications. I
can understand their dilemma. If they were to admit that global temperatures
were influenced by a natural climate driver, and that over the last two decades
this had, at least in part, led to rising temperatures, it would weaken their
argument that humans were causing damaging temperature increases.
A final point related to this graph. From 1879 to 1899 the
temperature at Stornaway rose by 2.49 degrees. For the same station the
temperature rose by 2.48 degrees from 1979 to 2003. This suggests that the rate
of increase of temperature in recent decades is not unusual.
Whilst the above chart and the data on temperature rise in
different periods are indicative, using just one climate station for the
northern part of Britain is, of course, insufficient to prove anything.
The Met Office website has data for 9 Scottish weather
stations. Six of these are land based and three, including Stornaway, are in
islands.
This chart is a plot of temperature data for all stations,
the blue line, and for land-based stations, the orange line. The land-based
stations are a degree or so warmer than the sea-based stations, they are generally further south, but otherwise there is no major difference. The
following analysis uses all stations.
The final chart in this posting shows the annual temperature trend averaged over all 9 met stations for two periods. The lines are in blue, from
1970 to the year 2000, and orange, from 2000 to 2020. The dotted lines show the
trend in temperature over time. The trend line for the last 20 years shows that
there has been no sensible increase in temperature in Scotland.
So, the proof of global warning, at least as it effects the
venue of the latest COP, is indeed “Something that is hard to find or does
not exist”. I am, of course, fully aware that what happens in a small country surrounded on three sides by the sea is not representative of the whole world. Nevertheless, the fact that the data represent stasis can be considered a "canary in the mine".
Comments
Post a Comment